NO KINGS – UNLESS THEY’RE YOURS

The No Kings Hypocrisy

“I am president, I am not king.”

That’s not a No Kings sign.  That is Barack Obama, October 25, 2010, explaining why he couldn’t change immigration law on his own.   He said it again on January 30, 2013: “I’m not a king.” Two weeks later: “I’m not the emperor of the United States.”

Then, in January 2014, before a Cabinet meeting: “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone.”

Funny how fast the crown fits when it’s your own head.

That is the No Kings movement in a nutshell.  The left wing radical liberals running it are not against kings. They are against THIS king.  When their side holds the scepter, the protest signs stay in the garage.

Let me walk through it.

Example Number 1. “Not Likely to Pass Constitutional Muster.”

August 2021.  The Supreme Court had already warned the CDC’s eviction moratorium couldn’t be extended without Congress.   On August 2, Jen Psaki put out a statement saying the CDC had been “unable to find legal authority for a new, targeted eviction moratorium.”

The next day, the CDC issued one anyway.

And President Biden told reporters, out loud: “The bulk of the constitutional scholarship says that it’s not likely to pass constitutional muster.” But “it’s worth the effort.”

Read that again.  The President admitted the experts thought it probably wasn’t constitutional, and did it anyway.

The Supreme Court struck it down on August 26, 2021.  And Jen Psaki, who announced the CDC couldn’t find the authority?  She now hosts a prime-time show on MS NOW.

Example Number 2. “That Didn’t Stop Me.”

July 28, 2021. Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on student loan forgiveness: “People think that the President of the United States has the power for debt forgiveness.  He does not.”  And: “The president can’t do it.  So that’s not even a discussion.”

Back in February 2021, Chuck Schumer had sponsored a Senate resolution, cosponsored by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, calling on Biden to “take executive action to broadly cancel” up to $50,000 per borrower.

Biden went for roughly $430 billion.  The Supreme Court struck it down in Biden v. Nebraska in June 2023.

His response, in February 2024: “The Supreme Court blocked it. But that didn’t stop me.”

Picture Donald Trump saying that EXACT sentence.

Fast forward to October 2025.  Chuck Schumer marched with the No Kings protest in New York City.  Bernie Sanders spoke at the No Kings rally in Washington, D.C.

Same executive power.  Different president.

Example Number 3. Ignore the Judge.

April 9, 2023.  A federal judge in Texas had suspended the FDA’s approval of the abortion pill mifepristone.  Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez went on CNN and said the Biden administration should ignore the ruling.

IGNORE a federal court.

That is exactly what the No Kings crowd warns Trump will do.

Example Number 4. Rules for Thee.

A king makes the rules and doesn’t live by them.   The COVID years handed us a whole royal court.

April 2020: Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot told residents that getting your hair done was “not essential,” then got a haircut while salons were closed.  Her defense: “I’m the public face of this city.”

August 2020: Nancy Pelosi got her hair done inside a San Francisco salon when the city wasn’t allowing salons to serve customers indoors.  When the video came out, she called it “clearly a setup” and said the salon owed HER an apology.

November 2020: Gavin Newsom, whose administration was telling Californians to limit gatherings to three households, sat down at the French Laundry in Napa with a table of 12 people from six households.  Afterward he admitted: “I made a bad mistake.”

The same Gavin Newsom who told everyone to join the No Kings marches in October 2025, because “THERE ARE NO KINGS IN THE UNITED STATES.”

Example Number 5. Say What We Tell You.

The No Kings crowd says nobody gets to dictate to anybody.  Then they hand you a list of words you are REQUIRED to say.

Where I stand: Pronouns follow biological sex.  And forcing a man to say something he believes is false isn’t tolerance.  It is compelled speech.

This isn’t hypothetical.  In 2018, Shawnee State University in Ohio put a written warning in philosophy professor Nicholas Meriwether’s file because he would not use female pronouns for a transgender student.  In March 2021, the Sixth Circuit ruled for him: “Shawnee State chose a different route: It punished a professor for his speech on a hotly contested issue.”  In 2022 the university settled.  It paid $400,000 and agreed he would never be required to use pronouns that conflict with a person’s biological sex, while still denying it did anything wrong.

New York City went further.  Its Human Rights Commission says employers, landlords and businesses must use the name and pronouns a person identifies with, including “ze/hir.”  Intentional or repeated refusal can count as harassment, and the city can impose civil penalties of up to $250,000 for willful violations.

Up to $250,000.  Over words.  So much for the Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression the left wing radicals scream about as the oppress anyone with whom they disagree with.

That’s not “no kings.”  That’s a king with a style guide.

Example Number 6. Change the Name. Or Else.

July 2, 2020.  Eighty-seven investment firms and shareholders sent letters pressing Nike, FedEx and PepsiCo to cut ties with Washington’s NFL team unless it dropped the Redskins name.  That same day FedEx, which held the stadium naming rights, asked the team to change it, and privately warned its signage would come down if the name stayed.

The team announced a review the next day.  On July 13, 2020, the Redskins name was retired.  In February 2022 it became the Commanders.

Here’s the part that got lost.  In 2016, a Washington Post poll of 504 Native American adults found 9 in 10 said the name did NOT offend them.

Cleveland followed.  MLB’s commissioner had already declared the Chief Wahoo logo “no longer appropriate” in 2018.  On July 23, 2021, the team announced the Indians, a name used since 1915, would become the Guardians.  A name meant to honor not one, not two, but the three first native Americans to play in major league baseball.  History erased by the liberals.

Over a hundred years of history, gone because the people with the money and the microphones decided for everyone else.

Example Number 7. The Camera Problem.

This August, Newsom signed AB 2624.  It shields immigrant-service workers’ addresses and restricts posting their personal information or images, including photos and video, with intent to incite violence or threats.  His side says it’s about doxxing.  Yet he has no problem demanding law enforcement show their full faces during immigration enforcement and responding to riots so he can have them doxxed.  Republican Assemblyman Carl DeMaio calls it the “Stop Nick Shirley Act,” after the independent journalist whose videos alleged fraud at taxpayer-funded programs. Shirley is challenging it in federal court.

When citizen journalists point cameras at taxpayer-funded programs and the answer is a new law about who can be filmed, I notice.  Not to mention, when you are in public, you have ZERO privacy. 

That is not principle.  It is a one-way rule and it is illegal.  It is a direct violation of the Freedom of the Press.  A right specifically created for EXACTLY this type of situation. 

The Bottom Line.

Here’s my test for the left wing radical liberals carrying the signs.  Name ONE time you objected when your own side was giving the orders.

Pen and phone?  Fine.  An eviction ban the President himself doubted was constitutional?  Fine.  Debt cancellation the Supreme Court said he couldn’t do?  Fine.   Ignoring a federal judge? Fine.  Telling you which pronouns to say and what your team gets to be called?  FINE.

Their defenders will say Trump is different.  Then be honest about it.  Your problem isn’t with kings.  Your problem is with who is sitting on the throne.

If you only hate kings when the other team wears the crown, you don’t hate kings.

You just want your own.

Mamdani Announces Discrimination Against Whites

Mandami wants to increase the real estate taxes of white homeowners in NYC and outer boros – specifically “….whiter neighborhoods.” White residents should initiate a pre-emptive lawsuit citing racial discrimination and violation of thr Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment – both of which prohibit racial discrimination in property rights and government actions, INCLUDING TAXACTION.

RHETORIC? The Greeks and Romans are turning over in their graves.

Rhetoric: the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, but often regarded as lacking in sincerity or meaningful content.

Lie: an untruthful assertion

And then we have the continued allegation that the current federal executive branch including local law enforcement and people with conservative philosophies are NAZIS.  That, is an entirely different speech.  Let’s review.

  1. It is a malicious falsehood.  Nazis are socialists and there has NEVER been a link between the current administration nor any “Nazi Party”.  This is nothing more than an attempt to deliberate damage.
  2. It is definitely hate speech and harassment.  Repeated false accusations are indeed harassment especially because it is associated with a pattern of abuse upon ICE agents.
  3. It is left wing radical liberal attempt to character assassinate as it deliberately tries to destroy reputation through continued false and inflammatory claims.
  4. Is is also propaganda and disinformation.  In the political and ideological context continued disinformation is nothing more than false propaganda.

The radical left wing, the politicians who support them, the woke media and “I’m an actor so I must be smarter than you” crowd fail to remember loaded accusations invokes historical atrocities and moral condemnation. 

It is reckless, it is dangerous, it is inflammatory, it is unethical, and if it results in someone shooting up a church full of children, or shooting at federal agents in a federal facility, or assassinating a conservative speaker, it is inciting riot and it is illegal. 

I’m So Confused

Which is worse?

Erasing history and enforcing mandated social justice so people can’t predict the patterns leading them to lose all freedoms – much like the left wing radical “cancellations”, forced corporate logo and name changes, forcing ridiculous changes to English grammar, and removing statutes.

Or simply not reporting the truth. Similar to left wing radicals declassifying serious crime, not reporting on issues that don’t support their radical agenda, pushing trans rights in sports but not saying how many girls are being injured by the males.

Trump is now suggesting he is sending the feds to Chicago. And although I certainly might have missed it, not even Fox News is showing Chicago citizens asking for help.

Trump might not really have the right to decide if there is proper law enforcement in Chicago. There are numerous “rights” that are left to the states to decide.

But as soon as there are valid reports of American citizens seeking assistance then it is a different story.

Exactly What Rights Are You Losing?

Flip through any Tic Tok or Instagram stream and you will find countless sites of left wing minded people and groups screaming about all the rights they have lost now that Trump won the election.

As a side note, Trump is not in office and hasn’t put out any, that is right – not one, policy that is being enforced. So, the complaint is an outright lie but for the probability they really mean the rights they are about to lose.

And exactly, what rights are they? Certainly, neither Trump, his current recommended cabinet appointees, nor anyone running in his circle has voiced any intention to take anyone’s rights. In fact, the only rumblings are the contracting (decrease in size) of government oversight thus INCREASING individual freedoms.

What are these people screaming about?? What freedoms are being or going to be taken away?

Well, here they are. You see the one and only way woke-ism can exist is through the subjugating of the un-woke. That is, the woke do not want freedom of speech, thought or expression. They demand the un-woke’s compliance with the woke agenda. The battle lines and differences between the woke and the un-woke play out mostly on social media, college campuses, the big screen and television (news shows, talk shows, late night, and sit coms). In social media the woke pushed for a huge cancel culture. On college campuses the woke demanded the de-platforming of speakers not subjecting themselves to their ideology. They also insisted on mandated diversity while screaming about cultural appropriation and outright public censuring of anyone with different viewpoints. Just watch any talk show and the political leanings of obvious.

Woke-ism demands social justice while allowing the outright grand theft from retail stores; allowing violent criminals to roam free and emboldening them to kill, rape, kidnap, steal, burn and destroy with not a fear for any consequences.

The woke will go so far as to say children do not belong to the parents, they belong to society. Wow, how Communist of them. The woke established policies that banned responsible educators, medical professionals, and law enforcement agencies from advising parents when their children were seeking gender change procedures. The woke socialist Education Secretary conspired with the National School Board Association to have parents arrested or “tracked” by the FBI if they voiced opposition to the teaching of critical race theory and highly questionable covid masking protocols and restrictions.

But, and please forgive the tired and worn out saying, there is a new sheriff coming to town. And the woke about to lose a whole bunch of rights.

The woke will lose the right to label parents as domestic terrorists for fighting against the indoctrination of their children to accepting critical race theory.

The woke will lose the right to dance around with barely a stitch of clothing on in front of young children. They will lose the right to have adult themed books in elementary school libraries. They will lose the right to force their sexual identities and preferences upon children.

The woke will lose their right to have the Justice Department’s Domestic Terrorist Unit harass, arrest, charge and prosecute political opponents.

The woke will lose their right to support the massive invasion of illegal immigrants and thus their dreams of having them vote, illegally, for liberal and Democrat policies and candidates.

The woke will lose their right to have economic policies kept in place that strangle small business, keep inflation high, and take away benefits from veterans and American homeless to support their illegal immigrant friends.

The woke will lose their right to silence opposing views in all areas including social media, college campuses, television and the big screen.

The woke will lose their right to demand diversity that force the hiring of people based upon skin color rather than their qualifications.

The woke will lose their right to criticize individuals for cultural appropriation. The woke want everyone divided and separate. The woke don’t want people to mix and mingle and enjoy each other’s cultures. The woke don’t want America to be the great melting pot anymore. And, one example of the hypocrisy of their demands is that white people should never have dreadlocks yet the complaint is coming from a black female with dutch blond white hair.

The woke will lose their right to harass and beat members of other religions. They will lose their right to protest by disrupting the lives of others. They will lose their right to loot, burn and destroy.

Perhaps the most significant right the woke will lose is the right to censure. They lose the right to silence. They lose the right to cancel. They lose the right to take away the un-woke rights to freedom of speech, freedom of expression, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom to defend themselves.

In the end, the woke are right. They’re about to lose a lot of freedoms.

FALL OF THE AMERICAN EMPIRE

Long ago a book was published with the title, “Fall of The Roman Empire”. I recall borrowing it (we called it “taking it out” back in the day) from the Brentwood Public Library in Brentwood, New York. I had taken it out with a bunch of other books and don’t recall ever actually reading it.

I have wondered if there were any comparisons between the fall of the Roman Empire to the reduction in America’s influence in the world including, what most agree to believe, the collapse of society and culture in the United States.

Someday, and I mean during this 2024 calendar year, I am going to find that book and actually read it. However, I have spent the last few days “googling it” and came up with what I believe to be 8 main parallels between what happened throughout the Roman Empire and what is occurring in the United States today.

  1. Failing economy / economic problems and reliance upon slave labor / unskilled workforce working for low wages. Rome had a long string of endless wars and over spending. The United States rarely, if ever since its existence, has been at peace. Its current spending deficit speaks for itself. In Rome there was an ever increasing gap in the wealth of the super rich and super poor. That happening in America speaks for itself. (I’m going to use that term a lot throughout this rambling.) Over taxation, high inflation and citizens fleeing the taxman into other countries exist in both examples (Rome and America).
  2. Trying to expand its influence throughout the world and overspending on military budgets. Rome did so by literally expanding itself across the European world and simply overextending its supply chains and reinforcement lines. America does so by “sticking its nose” in every foreign affair and its military overspending, especially to finance the Ukrain’s war with Russia, is infamous.
  3. For Rome it was the invasion by the Huns and migration of numerous clans of barbarians. For America it is the invasion across the southern border and migration of millions of numerous nationalities that do not accept American laws, ethics, freedoms, and culture – essentially our version of “barbarians”. During the Roman Empire times wars chased entire cultures fleeing attacks into Roman occupied and controlled areas. During our time millions are alleging they are political refugees fleeing war, famine and persecution. In both examples, the weakening of the society by the mass immigration allowed for enemy states to simply “walk right in”. Americans should be panicked by this example.
  4. Weakening of the Roman Military / Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the American Military. For Rome, it was the hiring of mercenaries because they couldn’t find qualified soldiers and the ones they did, did not have any loyalty to the legion. In America, the military is more interested in promoting unqualified members to meet quotas for “certain types” rather than promoting the actually qualified members. Allowing members with obvious mental problems to be promoted to high ranking positions, like Admirals, places military members, strategy, and safety at huge risk. Promoting members because of their gender or race simply to meet some “ratio” is just foolish.
  5. The collapse of religion and conservative values. For both examples, Rome and American (despite the separation of Church and State) interference by religious leaders and their insistence on laws to be imposed on everyone (think limitations on abortion as one example) and the absolute collapse of society and culture occurred in Rome and is occurring in the United States today.
  6. Government corruption and political instability. Is there any need for further discussion here? How is it possible that people of relative moderate means get elected into office, stay there for life, come out of office multimillionaires and not be “on the take” if not outright extorting their influence?
  7. The rise of the Eastern Empire. For Rome, it was dividing its empire into 2 main parts and having the eastern part governed by the Greeks. Attacks from “the east” contributed to the collapse of the entire empire. For America, it is the extreme divide in political appetite. There is extreme left wing socialism / bordering on marxist totalitarianism versus the extreme right wing conservatives / bordering on ancient English aristocratic culture and rule.
  8. Continued invasions by barbarian tribes / continued invasion of military aged and well fit “refugees”, drugs, criminals released from prisons if they agree to migrate north. For Rome, it was actual war parties invading its territories resulting in the defeat of the last Roman Ceasar – Augustulus around 476. For America it is the uncontrolled border crossings discussed in the heading that is leaving its citizens, its territory, its laws, its culture, its morals, values and ethics, and its existence all at great risk.

Will Americans ever look to the past to see what can happen in the present? There is a reason why the liberals in America want a dumbing down of the American student, the erasure of history, the actual re-writing of historical facts. They don’t want Americans to learn about what happened in the past so they, the liberals, can repeat it.

Alexander Hamilton and 1790

Wow – talk about foresight!! He wrote that a man unprincipled in private life, desperate in his fortune, and bold in his temper is seen to mount the hobby horse of popularity, he may ride the storm and direct the whirlwind.

We all know to whom I currently refer. The GOP, Republicans, and REAL conservatives need a solid candidate with a minimum of drama, conflicts of interest, and skeletons in the closet.

The INSANITY of The Ignorant

Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark, New Jersey (of all places) takes the position that all Americans should give up their 2nd Amendment rights as a way to achieve peace over violence. I guess I can stop right there considering the absolute idiocy of the statement. But, I’ll go on.

The Cardinal believes the right to bear arms is “eclipsed” by the responsibility to protect innocent people, secure public safety, and establish good order. What he plainly does not recognize is the fact that your 2nd Amendment right does EXACTLY that for not only you but those around you. Although rather cliche, it remains outright truth, the bad guys will always have access to guns.

Now before you start believing this is simply Catholic bashing, let me state I am a practicing Catholic, member of the Knights of Columbus and member of the 4th Degree of the Knights, and head usher at my Sunday morning Mass. I go to church every day except Saturdays.

The Cardinal goes on to say that only peace and never violence is the only truth. Hmmm, tell that to any of the remaining Holocaust survivors. Also reflect upon Great Britian’s appeasement policy in negotiating peacefully with Nazi Germany in the late 1930s / early 1940s only to have long range bombs dropped on them. So much for peace. The “real” truth is that sometimes you do indeed need to either respond with violence or act preemptively with violence to defeat evil. And, your 2nd Amendment right provides you with that ability.

He further goes on to say that only peace can build a free society. Hmm, again, apparently not a history buff. Our free society was built upon the need for guns and violence to defeat evil. Think the Revolutionary War; the Civil War; the First World War; the Second World War; the Invasion of Iraq. Free societies all over the world were built upon the need to use violence, not peace, to defeat evil.

He believes more gun laws and access control regulates our behavior in order to protect the vulnerable and ensure the common good. That statement in and of itself is ridiculous. No one, in the history of mankind, have ever protected vulnerable people without the need for violence. And, what “common good” does he refer to? Do you think any one living under an oppressive Communist, Socialist, or Dictatorship regime believes not having guns is good? Come on.

Every law abiding and legal concealed or open carry citizen gets sickened every time some nut shoots up our fellow Americans. And, perhaps that’s a point. You never hear that the shooter obtained his guns legally, or if he / she did, he or she didn’t have some kind of long term mental problems. Good people will not be saved from more “gun control”.

Here is example of what more gun laws and more “gun controls” looks like: There is a sign in your favorite coffee shop: “NO GUNS ALLOWED”. You’re a law abiding citizen. So, you take your holster off and lock your gun in your car. You go inside to enjoy your favorite brew. 10 minutes later three mutts come in and hold up the store and everyone in it. That sign, that gun control, just made you a sitting duck. But, not to worry, just act peacefully and you’ll be passed over like, well, Pass Over. No you won’t. You’ll be vulnerable and you’ll be a victim of violence.

There are hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of people in our country who don’t believe guns are the answer. They don’t believe violence defeats violence. Fortunately, for them, they are protected by those of us who do.

Cardinal Tobin, stay in your lane. You have enough to fix without making ridiculous statements that endanger your flock.

INDEPENDENCE

Independence.

It is a word we claim to be the backbone of our existence.

We even have a declaration of it.

We were for centuries very independent. As a country, as a society, as a culture, and as individuals.

But something happened. We let politicians make us dependent upon them (the government) for most basic needs: affordable housing; food stamps; emergency fuel; unemployment; etc.

We let big business, under the disguise of bigger dividends and stock values destroy our manufacturing capabilities and making us very much dependent upon an enemy who is FLUSH with American cash, building up its military, hacking our computers, and getting ready to take over other parts of the world to further enrich itself.

We let bleeding heart liberals cut into our constitutional rights – specifically our right to bare arms. So, now the only ones with easy access to guns are the bad guys. We become less and less able to defend ourselves from an invasion and occupation.

We let these very same liberals convince us that energy independence is bad. So, now as we watch another enemy invade its neighbor we do nothing but to continue to buy oil from it and our dependency on this enemy is well established and our gas prices sky rocket.

We aren’t the “greatest country in the world” when we become more and more less independent of others.